Caveat: The following is a completely
subjective review. I am by no
means an expert on
eyepiece optics
but I do have a working knowledge of
the basic concepts.
Tele Vue Optics has finally
officially
unveiled the Radians, a new line
of oculars that is intended
to provide
adequate eye relief for those who
must wear glasses while
observing.
They will be available next year in
focal lengths of 3, 4, 5, and
6mm (7 lens
elements) and 8, 10, 12, and
14mm (6 lens elements).
Like the Tele Vue Panoptics expensive
high
index lanthanum glass is used
in the manufacture of the
Radians.
These eyepieces will have a 60
degree apparent field
of view, a
well designed eye lens, and a generous
20mm of eye relief.
The 1/2 pound
Radians will all be the same price,
somewhere between the cost of
a 15 and
19mm Panoptic, and should be
binoviewer
friendly. They seem destined
to compete with the Pentax SMC
XL's in the wide-field
planetary eyepiece
race.
The pincushion distortion (i.e., lack
of
image linearity) that is
inherent in the Panoptic line
has been
virtually eliminated in the
Radian line by the use of a
Nagler style
negative lens system (i.e., a
"built-in Barlow
lens"). Some apparent
field of view was sacrificed to
produce longer eye
relief. (The
name Radian springs from the fact that
Mr. Nagler had originally
planned a 57
degree apparent field of view and
that one radian equals 57.3
degrees.)
A smoothly functioning 8
click-stop "Instadjust"
eyecup allows
proper positioning of the eye.
I have had three opportunities to
inspect
the 10mm Radian. The first
was at the Northeast
Astronomy Forum and
Telescope Show, which took
place in Suffern, New York on
May 3rd.
The 10mm Radian, unlike a 15mm
Tele Vue Panoptic, exhibited
no noticeable
pincushion distortion on an
indoor target when viewed
through a 85mm
Tele Vue refractor. The image
quality was quite
good. Intriguing,
but how would the Radian perform
under starry skies?
Two few months later at the 1998
Stellafane
convention I learned the
answer to that
question. I spent
some time on both Friday and Saturday
nights observing with "Uncle"
Al.
On Friday I had some very impressive
views of M31, M32, M110, and
M13 through
a 85mm Tele Vue refractor and
the Radian. The
sharpness of the
field and lack of pincushion
distortion were quite
evident. When
I positioned M13 so that only half
of it was visible, the stars
of this great
globular cluster were tack
sharp at the edge of the
field.
The Radian's contrast was excellent.
The next night I observed
Jupiter and
Saturn through a Tele Vue 140
refractor, the Radian, and a
Tele Vue
2x Barlow lens. Although the
magnification was only in the
150x range,
planetary performance seemed
very good indeed. I
noticed no obvious
ghosting.
On October 3rd I attended the annual
Tele
Vue Day at Pocono Mountain
Optics near Moscow,
Pennsylvania.
A number of Tele Vue refractors were
set up for daytime outdoor
viewing and
the 10mm Radian performed very
well visually. One
interesting result
of an eyepiece comparison between
the Radian and an 18mm Meade
SWA was the
fact that the apparent field of
view of the SWA (supposedly
67 degrees)
was almost identical to that of
the Radian. A bit
later Mr. Nagler
discussed the design principles of
the Radian, Panoptic, and
Nagler lines
with me at length.
Amateur astronomers from throughout
the
nation have been discussing the
new Radians on the
sci.astro.amateur newsgroup.
Joe Castoro reported
that he saw the 10mm at the
NEAF and that
it had a well corrected field
with exceptional
contrast. Robert
Cuberly used one at the Texas Star
Party and was impressed with
the flat
and very sharp field. Thomas Back
did a rough field test at
Pocono Mountain
Optics and admired the
Radian's highly corrected
field and lack
of distortion.
Judging from what I have seen and
heard
of the 10mm Radian I will be
replacing my 10.5mm Tele Vue
Plossl with
one in a few months time.
2. The 8mm Televue
Radian: Initial
Impressions
I am now the proud owner of a "really
rad"
Radian, one of three
eyepieces that I picked up at
the Northeast
Astronomy Forum and
Telescope Show on May
16th. Despite
the curse of recently acquired
astronomical equipment I got
to try out
my new 7mm Tele Vue Nagler and
8mm Radian on the same day
of purchase.
The eyepieces were used with a
114mm f/7.9 C4.5 and a 6"
f/10 ATM Dob
at my residence that Sunday
night.
My views of Mars were quite good
through
the 6" Dob and 8mm Radian
(190x), as were those of a
number of binary
stars including Gamma
Virginis. I even
caught some glimpses
of Niliacus Lacus through the
4.5" at 225x (8mm Radian and
2x Ultima
Barlow lens).
While comparing eyepieces of
different
focal lengths is a tricky
business I felt that the
Radian produced
better planetary views through
the 6" than did the 7mm
Nagler (218x).
The following night (5/18/99 UT) I
tested
the 8mm Radian using the 12.5"
f/6.5 Cave Newtonian
reflector at the
Astronomical Society of
Harrisburg's Naylor
Observatory (http://www.ezonline.com/ash/obs.htm).
Mars was superb at 258x
through the 12.5"
Cave and Wratten #21, 25, 30,
and 80A color filters. The
central meridian
was about 326 degrees at the
time and I had my best ever
view of Sinus
Sabaeus on the preceding
limb. The NPC,
which has reportedly
grown considerably of late, was
fairly prominent.
Comparing the Radian to an 8mm
Brandon,
I saw little difference in fine
contrast between the two
eyepieces but
a large difference in the two
fields of view.
(That is to say
that disregarding the difference in the
fields of view Mars appeared
very similar
in both oculars.) There was
noticeably more lateral color
at the extreme
edge of the field in the
Radian, however.
The sliding Instadjust eyeguard takes
a
little getting used to but works
quite well. It is
very effective
in reducing blackouts. Using the
Instadjust at full extension
had the effect
of reducing the Radian's
field of view rather
dramatically.
I also looked at a number of bright
deep-sky
objects using the Radian.
M3, M5, and M13 stood up to
the high magnification
nicely. The fine
open cluster M11 was simply
outstanding
at 258x through the 8mm.
Galaxies such as M51 and M104
did not
fare as well. Nor did the Dumbbell
Nebula, M27. I
should mention that
while the seeing was rather good
transparency was not.
Stars were very sharp right to the
edge
of the field. The Radian also
did a nice job of resolving
some close
binary stars such as Epsilon
Bootis. And I was
able to see the
dim glow of 13.7 magnitude Pluto
through the Tele Vue eyepiece.
On the following Tuesday evening at
22:05
UT I put the 8mm Radian to
work viewing the sun under
better than
average conditions. When used
with my C4.5 the Radian
(112x) produced
a larger image of the solar disk
than I am used to when I make
my solar
observations, which are usually
done at 53x (17mm Tele Vue
Ploessl).
One of the sunspots that were
visible was quite large and
was seen in
very sharp detail. The ample 60
degree apparent field of view
of the Radian
allowed the entire solar
disk to be observed with some
minor adjustment
of the telescope's
position.
It will be interesting to see how
favorably
my new Radian compares to a
7.5mm Pentax SMC XL, 7.5mm
Takahashi LE,
8mm Tele Vue Ploessl or other
high quality planetary
eyepieces of similar
focal length.
Dave Mitsky
ASH, DVAA