About 3 years ago I examined one of Siebert Optics first
production
binoviewers. Although a solid product with good
optical quality there were
a number of areas for improvement. It would appear
that in the interim
virtually all of these areas of improvement have been
met. Not all, but most.
The clear apertures are still in the 22-23mm
area, but virtually everything else has been improved.
Mechanically the
unit is excellent, with smooth inter-ocular adjustment
and quick easy change
barlow. You can go from a refractor or Dob to using
it without the barlow
in an SCT by a VERY simple shaft replacement. The
barlow shaft slides out easily
and is quickly replaced by a non-barlowed shaft, although
the 1.7x barlow
can be used in an SCT for extra magnification.
The 1.7x magnification gives
a nice low magnification and seems to improve the optical
quality of the
eyepieces used. So my best views through
the units in some of my faster
scopes were with the barlow in place. The eyepieces
that Siebert Optics
supplied (19mm Ultras) were good solid eyepieces, but
would not replace my
19mm Panoptics, although both had a comparible apparent
fov. This is not to
say that the 19mm's were not good and sharp, but did
not have quite as good
sharpness at the outer edge on my relatively fast
refractors and
Newtonians. These may be sharper to the field's edge
in longer focal
distance scopes, but by and large for the asking price
they would not be a
disappointment.
In action, The Siebert binoviewers work much like the
Televue binoviewers except
images are inverted. The binoviewers did exhibit more
"color" than the Televue binoviewers..
but contrast on the planets seemed a micro-tad better.
No out of field reflections could be noticed on these bright
objects which means that the Siebert units must be well
baffled.
Now for the potential for deepsky, the Televue units outperformed
the
Siebert units by a slim margin here also. The Televue
x2 corrector has a
small edge on the Siebert 1.7x barlow, but this does
not rule the Siebert's
out for deepsky by any means. Televue's
edge here was small and the
Siebert units gave very nice views on most DSO's.
But considering the price differential
the budget conscious astronomer should very well consider
these for more
than just planets. It's deepsky potential is considerable.
His price at
the time of posting this is $449-$469 and can be seen
at
www.SiebertOptics.com.
Here are a list of other things that have been improved:
1) Initially the unit had a 2.4x barlow. It
is now 1.7x and is near
parfocal with single eyepieces. The barlow is more
cleverly designed than
most others. I wish more had a quick integration
feature to their barlow
like this one. A lot of thought has gone into the
design of this barlow
method and the barlow also acts as an image erector in
Newtonians so your
view when using the barlow will match what you see when
looking at a star
map, although this will not be the case in an SCT or
refractor. The diagonal
will cause the image to be upsidedown, but correct left
to right. But in an
SCT simply removing the barlow will give an image orientation
equal to a
single eyepiece.
2) The plumbing fixture look that was once commonly
mentioned is now gone.
It has been replaced with fine finish stainless steel.
Also to save weight
it appears as though Delrin was used at what appeared
to be non-critical
areas. The binos weighed 1lb 2ozs with the non-barlowed
shaft. Nice for
delicately balanced instruments. 1lb 4ozs when
using the barlow.
3) The eyepiece holders are a fine application of
Delrin. It gave a very
snug fit and fine friction properties to any eyepiece
used with it. The
eyepieces never felt unstable or appear to shift in colimation.
But I am
sure most would agree that the self-centering eyepiece
holders that mark
better binoviewers seem to get much better results than
the old thumbknob
setups, which seem to have colimation problems.
No colimation problems
could be perceived with any eyepiece combinations I used
in the Siebert
unit.
All in all, I am very impressed with what Siebert Optics
has achieved in the
last 3 years. They started out with a good unit
and with some needed
improvements - Now they have wiped out nearly all the
negatives that were attached to the
early units. What we are left with is a unit that
I have become fond of and
would highly recommend to anyone. Although I slightly
prefer the Televues, I would probably
buy these over the Televue because of the price/performance
value had these been available
5 years ago.
Todd
SPECIAL NOTE 3/03: Harry has developed an unbelievably versatile
1.35X adapter / corrector that will also work on
the Televue binoviewers. It is excellent and only requires 1/4"
of in-travel.